Fungalpedia – Note 1193, Trichocladium

 

Trichocladium. Harz.

Citation when using this data: Hyde KD et al. 2020 (in prep.) – Fungalpedia, Ascomycota.

Index Fungorum, Facesoffungi, MycoBank, GenBank

Classification: ChaetomiaceaeSordarialesSordariomycetidaeSordariomycetesPezizomycotinaAscomycotaFungi 

Notes – Trichocladium was introduced by Harz (1871). A review of Trichocladium was undertaken by Goh & Hyde (1999) who accepted 18 species. Trichocladium species are polyphyletic within Chaetomiaceae, and other families (Shearer & Crane 1971, Kirk et al. 2008, Seifert et al. 2011, Jones et al. 2015). Based on the analyses of rpb2 and a combined rpb2, tub2, ITS and LSU datasets, 22 strains of Trichocladium formed a lineage, which includes four closely related subclades in Chaetomiaceae and they show morphologically diverse characters, and are phylogenetically distinct. The asexual morphs have conidiophores that are hyaline, developed laterally or terminally from the hyphae, and cylindrical, unbranched or branched, sometimes verticillate. Conidia are 1- to 2-celled, rarely 3-celled, obovate, pyriform, ellipsoid, constricted at the septa, conspicuously warted and olivaceous brown to dark brown, with paler basal cells. The sexual morph of Trichocladium is characterized by superficial or immersed ascomata in a thick mycelium, with or lacking ostioles. Asci are typically cylindrical, evanescent, with 8 (4) uniseriate ascospores which are typically broadly ovate, bilaterally flattened, sometimes ellipsoidal and non-flattened, with an apical germ pore (Wang et al. 2019b). 

Type species: Trichocladium asperum Harz 1871 (Designated by Clements & Shear, Gen. fung., Edn 2 (Minneapolis): 396. 1931).

Other accepted species: Species Fungorum – search Trichocladium.

 

References

Goh TK, Hyde KD. 1999 – A synopsis of Trichocladium species, based on the literature. Fungal Diversity 2, 101–118.

Harz CO. 1871 – Einige neue Hyphomyceten Berlins und Wiens nebst Beiträgen zur Systematik derselben. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 44, 88–147.

Jones EBG, Suetrong S, Sakayaroj J, Bahkali AH et al. 2015 – Classification of marine Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota and Chytridiomycota. Fungal Diversity 73, 1–72.

Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA. 2008 – Dictionary of the Fungi 10th edn. CABI, Wallingford.

Seifert KA, Gams W. 2011 –The genera of Hyphomycetes – 2011 update. Persoonia 27, 119–129.

Shearer CA, Crane JL. 1971 – Fungi of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. I. Patuxent River. Mycologia 63, 237–260.

Wang XW, Yang FY, Meijer M, Kraak B et al. 2019b – Redefining Humicola sensu stricto and related genera in the Chaetomiaceae. Studies in Mycology 93, 65–153.

 

Entry by

Kevin David Hyde, Institute of Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510225, P.R. China, Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand, Mushroom Research Foundation, 128 M.3 Ban Pa Deng T. Pa Pae, A. Mae Taeng, Chiang Mai 50150, Thailand, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand, Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, P.R. China, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand, World Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, P.R. China

 

Published online 28 February 2020