Fungalpedia – Note 1974, Schizoparmaceae

 

Schizoparmaceae. Rossman, D.F. Farr & Castl.

Citation when using this data: Hyde KD et al. 2020 – Fungalpedia, Ascomycota.

Index FungorumFacesoffungiMycoBankGenBank

Classification: DiaporthalesDiaporthomycetidaeSordariomycetesPezizomycotinaAscomycota, Fungi

 

Saprobic, endophytic, parasitic or pathogenic on fruits, leaves, stems, and roots of wide variety of woody and herbaceous plants, and in soil. Sexual morph: Ascomata perithecial, solitary, when collapsed collabent, scattered, subepidermal, erumpent to superficial, globose, coriaceous, brown to black, papillate, with periphysate ostiole in the center. Peridium of thick-walled, brown cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses lacking. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to subcylindrical, sessile, with a J-, apical ring, floating free at maturity. Ascospores biseriate, hyaline, becoming pale brown at maturity, ellipsoidal, aseptate, with or without mucoid caps. Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata pycnidial, subepidermal, immersed to semi-immersed, erumpent, unilocular, globose, slightly depressed globose to subglobose, glabrous, brown to dark brown or black, ostiolate. Peridium of irregularly thickened, with plate-like orientation, comprising brown cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores densely aggregated, simple or branched at base, occasionally septate, smooth, hyaline, subulate, invested in mucus, developing from basal pad. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, often annellidic, subcylindrical, obclavate or lageniform, discrete, hyaline, smooth, proliferating percurrently, or with prominent periclinical thickening. Conidia hyaline, becoming olivaceous brown to brown at maturity, unicellular, smooth, thin- or thick-walled, ellipsoid, globose, napiform, fusiform or naviculate with a truncate base and an obtuse to apiculate apex, at times with a longitudinal germ slit, with or without a mucoid appendage (adapted from Rossman et al. 2007).

Notes – Schizoparmaceae was introduced by Rossman et al. (2007) to accommodate Schizoparme and the asexual genera Coniella and Pilidiella (Rossman et al. 2007, Alvarez et al. 2016). Species of Schizoparmaceae are common in both tropical and temperate regions, worldwide (Rossman et al. 2007). Initially, the species in this family were placed in Melanconidaceae. Following Castlebury et al. (2002), who established the name ‘Schizoparme complex’ and their distinct lineage in Diaporthales, many comprehensive studies were conducted on the family (van Niekerk et al. 2004, Rossman et al. 2007, Alvarez et al. 2016). Even though, the family was established with three genera (Coniella, Pilidiella and Schizoparme), and after several taxonomic refinements, the family currently comprises a single genus (van Niekerk et al. 2004, Rossman et al. 2007, Alvarez et al. 2016). Based on the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (McNeil et al. 2012), Alvarez et al. (2016) synonymized Pilidiella and Schizoparme under the accepted generic name Coniella. Schizoparmaceae has a stem age at 70 MYA (Hongsanan et al. 2017). However, authors have mentioned that the data set used in the study was not sufficient to represent this morphologically diverse family. Most of the previous studies of this genus used single gene phylogenies of ITS and LSU for species delimitation (Castlebury et al. 2002van Niekerk et al. 2004Miranda et al. 2012). This approach is accepted for the preliminary identification. Confusions and inconsistencies in this method were addressed by multigene phylogenetic approach used in Alvarez et al. (2016) and Chethana et al. (2017). Therefore, it is recommended to use ITS, LSU, tef1, rpb2 and histone (selection of 4 genes) in combined analyses to resolve Coniella species (Alvarez et al. 2016Chethana et al. 2017).

 

Type genus – Coniella Höhn.

Other accepted species: Species Fungorum – search Schizoparmaceae.

 

References

Alvarez LV, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2016 – Revising the Schizoparmaceae: Coniella and its synonyms Pilidiella and Schizoparme. Studies in Mycology 85, 1–34.

Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Jaklitsch WJ, Vasilyeva LN. 2002 – A phylogeny overview of the Diaporthales based on large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 94, 1017–1031.

Hongsanan S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Samarakoon MC et al. 2017 – An updated phylogeny of Sordariomycetes based on phylogenetic and molecular clock evidence. Fungal Diversity 84, 25–41.

McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Turland N. 2012 – International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Ruggell: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag.

Miranda BEC, Barreto RW, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ. 2012 – Pilidiella tibouchinase sp. nov. associated with foliage blight of Tibouchina granulose (quaresmeira) in Brazil. Ima fungus 3, 1–7.

Van Niekerk JM, Groenewald JZE, Verkley GJM, Fourie PH et al. 2004 – Systematic reappraisal of Coniella and Pilidiella, with specific reference to species occurring on Eucalyptus and Vitis in South Africa. Mycological Research 108, 283–303.

 

Entry by

Kevin David Hyde, Institute of Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510225, P.R. China, Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand, Mushroom Research Foundation, 128 M.3 Ban Pa Deng T. Pa Pae, A. Mae Taeng, Chiang Mai 50150, Thailand, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand, Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, P.R. China, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand, World Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, P.R. China

 

Published online 11 March 2026