Fungalpedia – Note 994, Pseudofusicoccum

 

Pseudofusicoccum Mohali , Slippers & M.J. Wingf. 

Citation when using this data: de Silva NI et al. 2022 (in prep.) – Fungalpedia, Ascomycota.

Index FungorumFacesoffungiMycoBankGenBank, Fig 1

Classification: PseudofusicoccaceaeBotryosphaeriales, Incertae sedis, DothideomycetesPezizomycotinaAscomycota, Fungi

Crous et al. (2006) introduced Pseudofusicoccum with the type P. stromaticum. Species of Pseudofusicoccum are morphologically similar to Fusicoccum and Neofusicoccum but phylogenetically distinct from both of these genera (Crous et al. 2006Phillips et al. 2013). They exhibit as endophytes, saprobes or plant pathogens associated with diseases on stems, twigs, branches and leaves in various hosts and have a worldwide distribution (Mohali et al. 2006Doilom et al. 2015Jami et al. 2018Senwanna et al. 2020). The asexual morph is characterized by immersed to superficial pycnidial conidiomata, and hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical to ellipsoid conidia (Pavlic et al. 2008Yang et al. 2017Phillips et al. 2019). The sexual morph is characterized as globose to subglobose spots of ascomata on the host surface consisting hyaline, clavate ascospores surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath (Senwanna et al. 2020).

Type species: Pseudofusicoccum stromaticum (Mohali, Slippers & M.J. Wingf.) Mohali, Slippers & M.J. Wingf., in Crous, Slippers, Wingfield, Rheeder, Marasas, Phillips, Alves, Burgess, Barber & Groenewald, Stud. Mycol. 55: 249 (2006).

Other accepted species: Species Fungorum – search Pseudofusicoccum.

 

image

 

Figure 1 – Pseudofusicoccum adansoniae (MFLU 21-0244). a–c Appearance of conidiomata on substrate. d, e Vertical sections through of conidiomata. f Conidiomatal wall. g Conidiogenous cells. h–k Conidia. Scale bars: a = 500 μm, b = 300 μm, c = 200 μm, d, e = 50 μm, f = 20 μm, g–k = 5 μm.

 

References

Crous PW, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Rheeder J et al. 2006 – Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Studies in Mycology 55, 235–253.

Doilom M, Shuttleworth LA, Roux J, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD. 2015 – Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Tectona grandis (teak) in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 233, 1–26.

Jami F, Marincowitz S, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ 2018 – New Botryosphaeriales on native red milkwood (Mimusops caffra). Australasian Plant Pathology 47, 475–484.

Mohali S, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ. 2006 – Two new Fusicoccum species from Acacia and Eucalyptus in Venezuela, based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycological Research 110, 405–413.

Pavlic D, Wingfield MJ, Barber P, Slippers B et al. 2008 – Seven new species of the Botryosphaeriaceae from baobab and other native trees in Western Australia. Mycologia 100, 851–866.

Phillips AJL, Alves A, Abdollahzadeh J, Slippers B et al. 2013 – The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture. Studies in Mycology 76, 51–167.

Phillips AJ, Hyde KD, Alves A, Liu JKJ. 2019 – Families in Botryosphaeriales: a phylogenetic,morphological and evolutionary perspective. Fungal Diversity 94, 1–22.

Senwanna C, Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R et al. 2020 – First report of the sexual morph of Pseudofusicoccum adansoniae Pavlic, TI Burgess & MJ Wingf. on Para rubber. Cryptogamie Mycologie 41, 133–146.

Yang T, Groenewald JZ, Cheewangkoon R, Jami F et al. 2017 – Families, genera, and species of Botryosphaeriales. Fungal Biology 121, 322–346.

 

Entry by

Nimali Indeewari de Silva, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand, Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

 

Published online 18 November 2022